Set Life Goals That Actually Stick: Why 91% Fail and the 9% Succeed
Most life goals die quietly. Population surveys on New Year’s resolution adherence consistently find that only around 9% of people follow through on their goals for a full year, with most quitting well within the first month. The problem isn’t motivation. It’s that most people set life goals disconnected from who they are and what they value. Studies on self-concordance by Sheldon and Elliot found that goals matching a person’s core values and developing identity receive more sustained effort and produce greater well-being when achieved [2]. This guide covers how to set life goals that persist across months and years, not just the first burst of enthusiasm.
To set life goals that actually stick, identify your core values, then build identity statements connecting those values to specific measurable targets. Self-concordance research shows that values-aligned goals receive more sustained effort and produce greater well-being [2]. The five steps below cover values identification, identity bridging, domain auditing, the Roots-to-Branches Method, and persistence systems.
Life Goals are long-term objectives that span major domains of a person’s life, including career, relationships, health, finances, and personal growth. Unlike short-term targets or daily habits, life goals define the direction of years and decades. Setting life goals that stick means choosing objectives rooted in personal values and identity rather than external pressure or vague ambition.
What You Will Learn
- Why most life goals fail within weeks, and the root cause research has identified
- How to anchor life goals to your personal values before choosing targets
- How identity-based goals create stronger persistence than outcome-based goals
- How to audit your life domains to find the goals that matter most right now
- The Roots-to-Branches Method for translating values into goals that hold up over time
- Research-backed strategies for maintaining commitment across months and years
Key Takeaways
- Only around 9% of people sustain goals for a full year; early abandonment stems from a values disconnect, not a lack of willpower.
- Self-concordant goals receive more effort and produce higher well-being [2].
- Identity-based goals (“become a runner”) outperform outcome-based goals (“lose 20 pounds”) [4].
- Auditing life domains before setting goals prevents overload and surfaces priority areas.
- The Roots-to-Branches Method links values to identity to concrete goals in sequence.
- Immediate enjoyment during pursuit predicts persistence more than delayed rewards [8].
- Approach-oriented goals succeed at higher rates than avoidance goals [7].
- Quarterly reviews prevent drift and allow intentional course correction [9].
Why Do Most Life Goals Fail So Quickly?
The statistics on goal abandonment are consistent across studies. Resolution tracking surveys have repeatedly found that most people quit within the first month, with only around 9% still on track by year’s end. Research published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology by Norcross and colleagues found that people who make resolutions are ten times more likely to change behavior than non-resolvers with the same desires [1]. Goal setting works. The question is why specific goals collapse so fast.
What does self-concordance research say about goal failure?
Sheldon and Elliot’s self-concordance model answers this directly. Their research at the University of Missouri found that goals driven by external pressure or guilt (“I should lose weight” or “my parents expect me to get promoted”) received less sustained effort over time [2]. Goals that matched a person’s intrinsic interests and developing sense of self received more consistent effort and were more likely to be achieved. Life goal persistence depends more on values alignment than on specificity or initial motivation [2].
Sirois and Pychyl’s research on the intention-action gap describes this pattern further. People set goals with genuine intention, but goals that aren’t connected to anything deep enough don’t survive the first wave of difficulty [13]. Motivation fades, as it always does, and nothing underneath holds the goal in place.
Self-Concordance is the degree to which a goal aligns with a person’s authentic interests, core values, and developing identity. Goals high in self-concordance receive more sustained effort over time and produce greater well-being when achieved, according to Sheldon and Elliot’s research [2].
“Goals consistent with the person’s developing interests and core values received more sustained effort and were more likely to be attained, creating an upward spiral of well-being and future self-concordant goal pursuit.” — Sheldon & Elliot, 1999 [2]
This research explains why someone can be deeply motivated in January and completely disengaged by March. The motivation was real, but the goal wasn’t rooted in anything stable. For a deeper look at the mechanisms behind this pattern, see our guide on the psychology of goal setting.
| Reason for Goal Abandonment | Relative Frequency | Underlying Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Lost motivation | Most common | Goal not connected to intrinsic values |
| Too busy / competing priorities | Common | Goal didn’t rank high enough in true priorities |
| Changed goals or priorities | Common | Original goal was externally driven |
| Goal was too ambitious | Less common | No identity-level support for sustained effort |
| Forgot about it | Less common | No review system or environmental cues |
Set Life Goals Step 1: Start with Values, Not Targets
Why should you start with values before setting life goals?
Most goal-setting advice starts in the wrong place. It begins with “What do you want to achieve?” when it should begin with “What do you care about?” Research by Sheldon and Kasser (1998) found that people who set goals in line with intrinsic values — growth, connection, contribution — experienced higher well-being than those chasing extrinsic targets like status or wealth [3]. The target matters less than what drives it.
Values-first life goal setting means identifying what matters most across life domains before selecting any specific objective. This isn’t abstract self-help advice. It’s a filtering mechanism. When you know your top five values, goal selection becomes a process of elimination rather than a blank-canvas brainstorm.
Values-Based Goals are objectives chosen because they express a person’s core values rather than external expectations. ACT researcher Russ Harris describes values as “desired qualities of ongoing action” — directions you live by, not destinations you arrive at. Goals are the specific, measurable targets that express those values in concrete terms.
Here’s a practical exercise for identifying your core values before setting any personal life goals:
- List 10 moments in the past year where you felt most alive, proud, or engaged. Don’t filter. Write quickly.
- Look for patterns. Group similar moments. What theme connects the experiences where you felt most like yourself?
- Name the value underneath each cluster. These might be autonomy, mastery, connection, adventure, security, creativity, service, or something else entirely personal.
- Rank your top five. Force the ranking. Forcing a rank order clarifies what you’d protect if you had to choose.
- Test each current goal against your top five values. Any goal that doesn’t connect to at least one top-five value is a candidate for removal.
This values audit works well alongside a structured system like the BSQ framework, which breaks goals into Think Big, Act Small, and Move Quick phases. Values give the “Think Big” phase its direction. For another structured approach to connecting values and goals, see our guide on value-based goal setting.
Set Life Goals Step 2: Bridge the Gap Between Values and Action with Identity
How do identity-based goals create stronger persistence?
Values tell you what matters. But values alone don’t produce action. The missing link, according to Daphna Oyserman’s identity-based motivation research, is identity. Oyserman found that people act on goals that match who they believe they’re becoming [4].
Identity-Based Goals are objectives framed around who you are becoming rather than what you want to achieve. Instead of “run a marathon” (outcome-based), an identity-based goal says “I’m becoming a runner.” Research by Oyserman shows that identity-congruent goals receive more consistent effort because each action reinforcing the identity strengthens the belief behind the next action [4]. James Clear popularized this concept in Atomic Habits, distinguishing outcome-based from identity-based approaches [14].
Identity-based goals create a self-reinforcing loop: each action consistent with the identity strengthens the belief, and the stronger belief makes the next action easier [4]. Outcome-based goals create a gap between where you are and where you want to be. That gap can motivate at first, but it often demoralizes over time.
Oyserman’s research found that identity is dynamically constructed in context, meaning people can shape which identity comes to mind at decision points [4]. When a person identifies as “someone who writes daily,” the decision about whether to write on a difficult Tuesday is already partly made.
| Goal Type | Example | Persistence Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome-based | “Save $50,000” | Motivation declines when progress feels slow |
| Behavior-based | “Transfer $500 to savings monthly” | Consistent but fragile without deeper meaning |
| Identity-based | “I’m someone who builds financial security” | Self-reinforcing; survives setbacks and slow periods |
To translate your values into identity-based goals, use this two-part prompt for each life domain:
- Value prompt: “I deeply care about [value]. The person who lives by this value would be described as [identity].”
- Goal prompt: “Someone who is [identity] would, in the next 12 months, [specific measurable goal].”
For example: “I deeply care about growth. The person who lives by this value would be described as a lifelong learner. Someone who is a lifelong learner would, in the next 12 months, complete two professional certifications and read 24 books.” The goal now has roots.
The same sequence works across domains. For connection: “I deeply care about belonging. The person who lives by this value would be described as someone who shows up consistently for the people they love. Someone who shows up consistently would, in the next 12 months, schedule weekly time with their partner and monthly calls with three close friends.” The identity layer is what converts the value “connection” from an abstract principle into a specific, testable commitment.
Life Goals Step 3: Audit Your Life Domains Before Choosing Goals
How does a life domain audit prevent goal overload?
One of the fastest paths to goal failure is setting goals in too many areas at once. Research on goal conflict by Emmons and King (1988) found that people pursuing conflicting goals — like “advance my career aggressively” and “spend more time with family” — experienced lower well-being and less progress on both [5]. Life domain auditing helps you avoid this trap by clarifying where you stand before deciding where to go.
Goal Conflict occurs when pursuing one goal interferes with progress on another. Emmons and King found that people experiencing high goal conflict reported lower well-being and made less progress on their objectives [5]. Auditing life domains before setting goals reveals these conflicts early.
A life domain audit rates current satisfaction and investment across all major areas of life, revealing both neglected domains and areas of over-investment. The goal isn’t to score high everywhere. It’s to spot the gaps between what you value and where your time actually goes.
Rate each domain on two scales (1-10): current satisfaction and current time/energy investment. Domains where satisfaction is low but importance is high are your priority areas for new personal life goals.
Life Domain Audit Worksheet
Rate each domain on two scales (1-10), then flag any domain where satisfaction is 3+ points below importance.
| Life Domain | Satisfaction (1-10) | Time Investment (1-10) | Priority Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career / Work | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
| Health / Fitness | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
| Relationships / Family | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
| Finances / Security | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
| Personal Growth / Learning | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
| Fun / Recreation | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
| Contribution / Community | ___ | ___ | High gap = priority |
Rule of thumb: Limit active goal setting to 2-3 priority domains. Two goals with full commitment produce more change than seven goals at 14% effort each.
Limiting active goals to two or three domains feels restrictive, but research on self-regulation supports the constraint. Baumeister and colleagues found that self-regulatory capacity is limited (though the strength of this effect is debated in recent replications), and pursuing too many goals depletes the resources needed for follow-through [6]. Two life goals with full commitment produce more change than seven at fractional attention.
Here are concrete life goal examples that demonstrate the values-to-goal translation across domains:| Life Domain | Core Value | Identity Statement | Life Goal Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | Mastery | “I’m becoming an expert who creates meaningful work” | Earn a professional certification and lead one major project this year |
| Health | Vitality | “I’m someone who treats my body as a long-term investment” | Build a 4x/week exercise habit and complete a half-marathon |
| Relationships | Connection | “I’m a person who nurtures deep relationships” | Schedule weekly one-on-one time with partner and monthly calls with three close friends |
| Finances | Security | “I’m someone who builds financial resilience” | Save 6 months of expenses in an emergency fund and start investing $200/month |
| Personal Growth | Curiosity | “I’m a lifelong learner who seeks new perspectives” | Read 24 books this year and complete one course outside my field |
| Contribution | Service | “I’m someone who gives back to my community” | Volunteer 4 hours monthly with a local organization and mentor one person |
Each example traces back through the value-identity-goal chain. Goal setting for life works best when each target has this kind of root system underneath it.
For a structured method of balancing goals across domains, the BSQ framework offers a specific system for prioritizing life balance. And for broader planning across timeframes, see our guide on short and long-term planning.
Step 4: Apply the Roots-to-Branches Method
What is the Roots-to-Branches Method for life goal setting?
The Roots-to-Branches Method is a goal architecture that sequences self-concordance research into four layers: values (roots), identity (trunk), 12-month goals (branches), and weekly actions (leaves). Most goal-setting approaches start at the branches and wonder why the tree falls over. This method reverses the sequence, building downward to the values layer before selecting any target.
The four layers of the Roots-to-Branches Method:
- Roots (Values): Identify your top 3-5 core values using the exercise from Step 1. These don’t change often and serve as the anchor for everything above.
- Trunk (Identity Statements): Write one identity statement per priority domain. Format: “I am becoming someone who [description that embodies value].” This identity layer bridges what you care about and what you do.
- Branches (12-Month Goals): Set one specific, measurable goal per identity statement. Each goal should be something that, if achieved, would confirm the identity. Use approach framing (“I will build a consistent exercise practice”) rather than avoidance framing (“I will stop being sedentary”). A large-scale study on New Year’s resolutions found that approach-oriented goals were significantly more successful than avoidance-oriented goals [7].
- Leaves (Quarterly Milestones and Weekly Actions): Break each 12-month goal into quarterly checkpoints and weekly behaviors. The weekly behaviors are where persistence actually lives. Woolley and Fishbach’s research found that immediate rewards — like enjoyment during the activity — predict persistence more strongly than delayed rewards like the eventual outcome [8].
Goal Persistence is the sustained pursuit of a goal over time, including the ability to resist urges to quit, recognize opportunities for pursuit, and return to the goal after disruptions. Holding and colleagues describe goal persistence as a three-component cycle rather than a single act of willpower [9].
“Immediate rewards were a stronger predictor of actual persistence in a new activity than were delayed rewards.” — Woolley & Fishbach, 2017 [8]
Here’s what the Roots-to-Branches Method looks like for one life domain:
| Layer | Example (Health Domain) |
|---|---|
| Root (Value) | Vitality, physical strength |
| Trunk (Identity) | “I am becoming someone who treats their body as a long-term investment” |
| Branch (12-Month Goal) | Complete a half-marathon and maintain 4x/week training consistency |
| Leaf (Q1 Milestone) | Build a 3x/week running habit, reach 5K distance comfortably |
| Leaf (Weekly Action) | Run Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday mornings; enjoy the route and the process |
Notice the emphasis on enjoyment at the leaf level. If the weekly actions feel like punishment, persistence will collapse regardless of how well the goal fits your values. The Roots-to-Branches Method builds enjoyment into the bottom layer not as a bonus but as a structural requirement for long-term life goal persistence [8]. That distinction separates it from frameworks that treat motivation as a fixed resource you spend down over time.
This framework complements rather than replaces specific goal-setting methods. SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) excel at adding precision and accountability once a goal is chosen. What SMART does not address is whether the goal should be chosen in the first place. A SMART goal built on external pressure or vague ambition is still subject to the values-misalignment failure pattern described in Step 1. The Roots-to-Branches Method handles the layer SMART leaves out: why this goal, grounded in who you are becoming. Use both: Roots-to-Branches to select and frame the goal, SMART criteria to sharpen its specifications. For a comparison of these approaches in practice, see our guide on how to follow through on goals.
Setting the right goals solves the alignment problem, but alignment alone doesn’t guarantee follow-through. Even values-rooted goals face disruption from life changes and the natural decay of enthusiasm. The next step addresses what keeps goals alive after the clarity of goal-setting day fades.
Roots-to-Branches Readiness Check
Before moving to persistence systems, check where you stand on the three foundations of goal-setting that actually sticks:
- Have you identified your top 5 core values? (If not, return to Step 1 before setting any targets.)
- Have you written at least one identity statement per priority domain? (If not, Step 2 is the highest-leverage place to spend the next 10 minutes.)
- Have you limited active goal-setting to 3 or fewer domains? (If not, return to the domain audit in Step 3 and apply the 2-3 domain constraint.)
Any “no” answer means the persistence systems in Step 5 will be harder to maintain. The sequence matters: roots before branches.
Set Life Goals Step 5: Build the Systems That Keep Life Goals Alive
What systems help maintain long-term goal persistence?
Setting the right goals is necessary but not sufficient. Long-term persistence depends on what happens between the moment of life goal setting and the months that follow. Research on goal persistence identifies three processes that keep people on track: resisting the urge to quit, recognizing opportunities for pursuit, and returning to the goal after disruptions [9].
Goal persistence operates as a cycle of resisting, recognizing, and returning that repeats across the full life of any long-term goal [9]. Here are four systems that support all three processes:
Quarterly life goal reviews. Schedule a 60-minute review every three months to assess each life goal against your current values, identity, and circumstances. A goal that was on track in January may need adjustment by April. That’s not failure — it’s responsive goal management. Quarterly reviews address the common pattern of abandoning goals when priorities shift without formally updating what you are pursuing. For a step-by-step approach, see our guide on the weekly goal review process, which also covers quarterly cadences.
Environmental Design for Goals is the practice of structuring physical and digital surroundings so that goal-relevant behaviors become the path of least resistance. Wood’s research shows that roughly 43% of daily behavior is habitual and cue-driven [10], making environmental design a powerful lever for long-term goal persistence.
Environmental design. Make goal-relevant behaviors the default. If your life goal involves writing, set up a dedicated writing space. If it involves fitness, lay out workout clothes the night before. Environmental design reduces the daily decision cost of pursuing long-term goals.
Approach framing over avoidance framing. A study tracking over 1,000 participants found that approach-oriented resolutions (moving toward something positive) were significantly more successful than avoidance-oriented resolutions (moving away from something negative) [7]. Frame your life goals as what you’re building, not what you’re escaping.
Approach-Oriented Goals are objectives framed around moving toward a positive state rather than away from a negative one. Oscarsson and colleagues found that approach-framed goals showed a success rate of 58.9% compared to 47.1% for avoidance-framed goals in a study of over 1,000 resolution-setters [7]. The distinction is practical: “build consistent exercise habits” is approach-framed; “stop being sedentary” is avoidance-framed.
Social scaffolding. Share your life goals with one to two people who understand your values, not just your targets. Research on accountability shows that structured progress sharing raises goal completion rates significantly [11]. The key distinction: your accountability partner needs to understand the why behind the goal. Someone who knows you value creativity will respond differently to a missed writing session than someone who only sees a broken streak. For a comprehensive look at how reviews support goal achievement, see our guide on goal achievement reviews. For strategies on personal growth that complement this approach, explore our personal development strategies guide.
When should you adjust a life goal vs abandon it entirely?
Persistence systems help you stay on track when friction is temporary. But not every stalling goal deserves another push. Use this decision rule: if the values that originally drove the goal have genuinely shifted, the goal should shift with them — adjusting the target or timeline rather than forcing commitment to something that no longer fits. If the goal was driven externally from the start (someone else’s definition of success, a status marker, social pressure), and the values audit confirms it, drop it cleanly. Quiet abandonment — letting goals fade without a deliberate decision — is the version that damages confidence. A clean release, grounded in updated values, is responsible goal management, not failure. For a step-by-step approach to these decisions, the goal achievement reviews guide covers the quarterly review process in detail.
“Specific, hard goals led to a higher level of task performance than did easy goals, ‘do your best’ goals, or no goals, and this finding has been replicated hundreds of times.” — Locke & Latham, 2002 [12]
Specific, challenging life goals produce higher performance than vague or easy goals 90% of the time [12]. But specificity alone isn’t sufficient. The Roots-to-Branches Method makes sure specific goals grow from identity and values rather than floating in isolation. A specific goal with roots holds. A specific goal without them snaps at the first strong wind.
For a complete system to track your life goals once they’re set, see our goal tracking systems guide.
Ramon’s Take
I changed my mind about life goals a few years ago. I used to set them the way most people do: pick an impressive target, write it down, feel motivated for two weeks, then quietly stop thinking about it. My turning point came when I noticed that the goals I’d actually followed through on had nothing to do with how ambitious they were. They were the ones I could explain why I cared about without referencing anyone else’s expectations. The career goal I pursued for three years wasn’t “get promoted.” It was “become someone who builds things that help people.” The health goal that stuck wasn’t “run a marathon.” It was “be the kind of person who moves every day.” My honest advice: cut your goal list in half. Then ask which of the remaining goals you’d still pursue if nobody ever found out you achieved them. If a goal only feels meaningful when other people notice it, that’s a signal it’s externally driven. Those goals have a shelf life. The ones rooted in your actual values don’t expire. They just evolve.
Set Life Goals Conclusion: Start From Who You Are, Not Where You Want to Be
The 91% who abandon their goals don’t fail from laziness. They fail from building on a foundation that can’t hold weight. Life goals that stick are rooted in personal values, filtered through identity, and supported by systems that account for the reality that motivation fades. The Roots-to-Branches Method gives you the sequence: values first, then identity, then goals, then actions. That order matters more than any specific target you pick.
The problem is never the ambition. It’s the foundation underneath it. Get the foundation right once and the goals almost choose themselves. Once you have that foundation in place, what comes next is tracking your goals well enough to stay honest with yourself. That is a different skill, and a different guide.
Next 10 Minutes
- Write down 10 moments from the past year where you felt most alive or proud (the values exercise from Step 1)
- Group those moments and name the top 3 values they reveal
- Write one identity statement: “I am becoming someone who [lives this value]”
This Week
- Complete the life domain audit table and identify your top 2-3 priority domains
- Apply the Roots-to-Branches Method to build one complete goal from value to weekly action
- Schedule a quarterly life goal review in your calendar for three months from today
There is More to Explore
This article covers how to set life goals that stick. For tracking systems to monitor goals over time, start with our goal tracking systems guide. To understand the research behind why goals work, read our piece on the science of goal setting. For a framework to balance goals across life areas, explore the BSQ framework. And if your challenge is follow-through rather than goal selection, our follow-through framework picks up where this guide leaves off.
Take the Next Step
Ready to put these principles into practice? The Life Goals Workbook provides a guided worksheet for completing the Roots-to-Branches Method across all seven life domains, plus quarterly review templates to keep your goals on track year after year.
Related articles in this guide
- set-up-okr-tracking-system
- using-goal-achievement-reviews-for-course-correction
- weekly-goal-review-process
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I set life goals when I don’t know what I want?
Start with values instead of goals. List 10 moments from the past year where you felt most energized, proud, or fully engaged. Look for patterns across those moments and name the underlying values (growth, connection, autonomy, creativity). Those values point toward goal domains when specific targets feel unclear. Research on self-concordance shows that values-connected goals receive more sustained effort than goals chosen from external expectations [2].
What are the most important life domains to set goals in?
The seven common life domains are career, health, relationships, finances, personal growth, fun and recreation, and community contribution. Research on goal conflict suggests limiting active goals to two or three priority domains at a time [5]. Rate each domain on satisfaction and time investment to find the biggest gaps between what you value and where your energy actually goes.
Why do my life goals keep changing every few months?
Frequent goal shifts often signal that the original goals were externally motivated rather than rooted in personal values. Self-concordance research shows that goals driven by guilt, obligation, or social comparison receive less sustained effort and are more likely to be abandoned [2]. If your goals keep changing, the fix isn’t better goals but deeper clarity on your values and identity first.
Should life goals be specific or broad?
Both, at different levels. Your identity statement and value direction should be broad (‘become a person who builds financial security’). Your 12-month target should be specific and measurable (‘save $15,000 in an emergency fund by December’). Locke and Latham’s research confirms that specific, challenging goals produce higher performance than vague goals [12], but specificity works best when it grows from a broader values foundation.
How many life goals should I have at one time?
Research on self-regulation and goal conflict supports limiting active life goals to two or three at a time [5][6]. More goals spread your attention and self-regulatory resources too thin, reducing follow-through on all of them. You can maintain a longer list of ‘horizon goals’ across life domains — aspirations you’re aware of but not actively pursuing this quarter — while keeping only two or three goals in active pursuit. Cycling goals seasonally lets you address more domains over a year without the performance cost of simultaneous pursuit.
What is the difference between life goals and New Year’s resolutions?
New Year’s resolutions are typically single behavior changes tied to an arbitrary date. Life goals span major life domains and operate on a timeline of years. The failure rates overlap — both suffer from the same root issue of goals set without values or identity support. The Roots-to-Branches Method applies to both, but life goals require the added step of auditing life domains and building identity statements.
How often should I review my life goals?
Quarterly reviews are the recommended cadence for life goals. Weekly reviews work for tracking daily and weekly actions, but life goals need a wider lens. A 60-minute quarterly review lets you assess whether goals still match your current values, adjust targets based on changed circumstances, and set new quarterly milestones. This cadence prevents the silent drift where goals become irrelevant but never get formally updated.
What if I fail at a life goal I set?
Failure at a specific target doesn’t invalidate the underlying value or identity. If you set a goal to run a half-marathon and get injured at month four, the identity of ‘someone who invests in physical health’ still holds. Research on goal persistence shows that returning to pursuit after disruption is a normal part of the process, not a sign of failure [9]. Adjust the target and keep the roots intact.
This article is part of our Goal Tracking Systems complete guide.
References
[1] Norcross, J. C., Mrykalo, M. S., Blagys, M. D. “Auld Lang Syne: Success Predictors, Change Processes, and Self-Reported Outcomes of New Year’s Resolvers and Nonresolvers.” Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(4), 397-405, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1151 | PubMed
[2] Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J. “Goal Striving, Need Satisfaction, and Longitudinal Well-Being: The Self-Concordance Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482-497, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482 | PubMed
[3] Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T. “Pursuing Personal Goals: Skills Enable Progress, but Not All Progress Is Beneficial.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319-1331, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412006 | APA PsycNet
[4] Oyserman, D., Destin, M. “Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention.” The Counseling Psychologist, 38(7), 1001-1043, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010374775 | PMC3079278
[5] Emmons, R. A., King, L. A. “Conflict Among Personal Strivings: Immediate and Long-Term Implications for Psychological and Physical Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1040-1048, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1040 | PubMed
[6] Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., Tice, D. M. “Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 Note: The ego depletion effect is contested in recent replication attempts.
[7] Oscarsson, M., Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., Rozental, A. “A Large-Scale Experiment on New Year’s Resolutions: Approach-Oriented Goals Are More Successful Than Avoidance-Oriented Goals.” PLOS ONE, 15(12), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234097 | PubMed
[8] Woolley, K., Fishbach, A. “Immediate Rewards Predict Adherence to Long-Term Goals.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(2), 151-162, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676480
[9] Holding, A. C., Hope, N. H., Verner-Filion, J., Sheldon, K. M., Koestner, R. “Resisting, Recognizing, and Returning: A Three-Component Model and Review of Persistence in Episodic Goals.” Motivation Science, 2022. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8774291/
[10] Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., Kashy, D. A. “Habits in Everyday Life: Thought, Emotion, and Action.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1281-1297, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1281
[11] Matthews, G. “Goals Research Summary.” Dominican University of California, 2015. https://www.dominican.edu/dominicannews/study-highlights-strategies-for-achieving-goals
[12] Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey.” American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 | PubMed
[13] Sirois, F. M., Pychyl, T. A. “Procrastination and the Priority of Short-Term Mood Regulation: Consequences for Future Self.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115-127, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011
[14] Clear, J. Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones. Avery, 2018.
