Goals & Progress
Most goal systems work for one ambition. They fall apart when you need balance.
The BSQ Framework is a personal goal-setting method created by psychologist David Van Rooy that breaks every life domain into three layers: Think Big sets the 3-to-5 year vision, Act Small turns it into milestone subgoals, and Move Quick attaches deadlines so the first action happens within 48 hours. It works because each component maps onto separate peer-reviewed mechanisms – goal-setting theory, decomposition, and implementation intentions.
You finally start hitting your savings target, and your fitness routine falls apart. You fix the fitness, and your relationship suffers. It’s not that you lack ambition – it’s that your system only handles one goal at a time.
Most goal-setting systems work fine for a single ambition. They help you lose weight, or land a promotion, or save more money. But the moment you try to pursue goals across multiple life domains at the same time, the system cracks. You overinvest in one area and quietly starve the others.
Research from Locke and Latham’s goal-setting theory shows that breaking distal goals into proximal subgoals increases self-efficacy, persistence, and performance [1]. The BSQ framework goal setting model, developed by organizational psychologist David Van Rooy, Ph.D., builds on this science with a three-part structure: Think Big, Act Small, Move Quick [2]. Can a system this simple actually bring balance to a multi-domain life?
BSQ Framework Goal Setting is a three-part goal-setting system created by David Van Rooy, Ph.D. It stands for Think Big (define your 3-5 year vision), Act Small (break that vision into milestone subgoals), and Move Quick (attach deadlines to each milestone so progress starts immediately). The framework was introduced in Van Rooy’s book Trajectory: 7 Career Strategies to Take You from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be (2014).
What You Will Learn
- What the BSQ framework is and where it came from
- How to apply Think Big, Act Small, and Move Quick step by step
- The research supporting each part of the BSQ model
- How to use BSQ across multiple life domains without burning out
- A new framework for matching goal speed to life area
- How BSQ compares to SMART goals, OKRs, and other frameworks
Key Takeaways
- BSQ stands for Think Big, Act Small, Move Quick, and was created by psychologist David Van Rooy.
- Think Big means defining a 3-5 year vision goal that sets the direction for all smaller actions.
- Act Small means breaking that vision into milestone subgoals, which research shows improves persistence and self-efficacy.
- Move Quick means attaching deadlines so you begin acting within days, not months.
- Implementation intentions raise goal achievement by a medium-to-large effect size (d = .65) across 94 studies.
- BSQ works best for life balance when you run it across multiple domains with staggered timelines.
- The Domain Velocity Map helps you set different speeds for different life areas based on current priorities.
- Writing goals down and sharing progress with a friend raised achievement by 33% in Matthews’ Dominican University study, though the sample was small.
What is the BSQ framework and where did it come from?
David Van Rooy holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Organizational Psychology from Florida International University. He has published numerous peer-reviewed research articles and held leadership roles at Walmart, Marriott International, and Burger King [2]. His book Trajectory (2014) introduced Van Rooy goal setting as a direct response to what he saw as the main failure of popular goal-setting approaches: they pile on complexity without producing better results. The approach he developed, Think Big Act Small Move Quick, compresses the entire system into three words per step.
Precursors and parallel formulations
Van Rooy’s 2014 BSQ formulation was not the first time a similar three-beat structure appeared in print. Nicholas LaRusso and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation published Think Big, Start Small, Move Fast in 2014, applying a near-identical cadence to healthcare innovation rather than personal goal setting [8]. The structural overlap is real, but the audiences and applications differ: Van Rooy’s BSQ targets individual multi-domain trajectories, while the Mayo formulation targets organizational innovation cycles. When citing BSQ for personal goal setting, Van Rooy is the correct attribution.
Van Rooy’s argument is that most frameworks add layers of criteria, categories, and tracking mechanisms that make the system itself feel like work. BSQ strips goal setting down to three moves: aim high, break it apart, and act fast. The simplicity is intentional. BSQ framework goal setting works because the entire system fits in one sentence: Think Big, Act Small, Move Quick. If you can’t explain your goal system that fast, Van Rooy argues, you probably won’t stick with it [2].
Goal Decomposition is the process of breaking a large, distant goal into smaller, proximal subgoals that can be acted on individually. Goal decomposition reduces cognitive load and increases persistence by providing frequent progress signals. Unlike simple task listing, goal decomposition preserves the hierarchical link between each subgoal and the original vision.
BSQ fits within a larger family of proven goal-setting frameworks. But where SMART goals focus on making each goal specific and measurable, and OKRs focus on alignment between objectives and key results, BSQ focuses on something different: the relationship between ambition, granularity, and speed. It asks you to hold all three at once.
The combination of long-term vision, milestone decomposition, and speed in BSQ turns out to be well-supported by research, as the next section explains.
How do you apply the three BSQ components step by step?
Each part of the BSQ framework serves a distinct psychological function. Here’s how to put all three into practice.
Step 1: Think Big (define your 3-5 year vision)
Think Big is the first component of the BSQ framework. Think Big differs from open-ended vision exercises by requiring the goal setter to define a specific, time-bounded future state within a 3-5 year window, providing directional clarity for all subsequent smaller actions.
The “Think Big” component asks you to identify what you want your life to look like in 3 to 5 years. This isn’t a vague daydream. It’s a specific picture of a future state: “I own a profitable consulting practice,” “I can run a half marathon,” or “My family eats dinner together five nights a week.”
Construal-level theory supports this approach. Trope and Liberman’s construal-level theory research found that thinking abstractly about distant goals — focusing on the ‘why’ over the ‘how’ — keeps attention on central, desirable features rather than feasibility concerns, which supports long-range planning [5]. Big-picture thinking in BSQ goal setting gives smaller actions a directional anchor that prevents drift.
To apply this step:
- Write one sentence describing your desired outcome in 3-5 years.
- Make it vivid and specific enough that you could recognize it if you arrived there.
- Don’t add conditions or caveats. This is the full target.
Step 2: Act Small (break the vision into milestone subgoals)
Act Small is the second component of the BSQ framework. Act Small converts a distant vision into a sequence of measurable milestone subgoals, each one serving as a checkpoint that builds self-efficacy and strategic thinking along the way.
The “Act Small” component is where BSQ connects to decades of goal decomposition research. Locke and Latham found that performance errors on complex tasks are often caused by deficient decomposition of distal goals into proximal subgoals [1]. Across their broader research program covering more than 40,000 participants in nearly 400 laboratory and field studies on over 88 task types [1], breaking big goals into smaller checkpoints consistently produced wins that build confidence and momentum.
This also connects to the psychology of chunking. Research published by Gobet and colleagues in Trends in Cognitive Sciences shows that grouping individual actions into manageable units frees up mental resources, which then become available for problem-solving and adaptation [6]. Your milestones are cognitive chunks. They make the big goal feel less overwhelming.
To apply this step:
- List 3-6 milestones between where you are now and your 3-5 year target.
- Each milestone should be a clear checkpoint you can measure or confirm.
- Arrange them in sequence so each one builds on the last.
This is where BSQ overlaps with the difference between habit goals and achievement goals. Some of your milestones will be achievement-based (“complete certification”), and others will be habit-based (“practice 30 minutes daily for three months”). Both types belong in the sequence.
Step 3: Move Quick (attach deadlines and start immediately)
Move Quick is the third component of the BSQ framework. Move Quick requires attaching specific deadlines to every milestone and scheduling the first action within 48 hours, closing the gap between planning and doing.
The “Move Quick” component is what separates BSQ from systems that generate plans but not action. Van Rooy insists that every milestone needs a deadline, and that you should be able to start working on the first one within days, not weeks [2].
Gollwitzer and Sheeran’s meta-analysis of 94 independent studies with over 8,000 participants found that forming implementation intentions – specific if-then plans for when and where to act – produced a medium-to-large effect (d = .65) on goal attainment [3]. The gap between deciding on a goal and actually doing something about it is where most goals quietly die. Speed matters.
Implementation Intentions are specific if-then plans that pre-commit a person to acting on a goal at a particular time, place, or in response to a particular cue. Implementation intentions differ from general goal intentions by specifying the situational trigger, which automates goal-directed behavior and reduces the need for in-the-moment deliberation.
To apply this step:
- Assign a target date to each milestone from Step 2.
- Identify the very first action you can take on Milestone 1 and schedule it within 48 hours.
- Create an if-then plan: “If it’s [day/time], then I’ll [specific action].”
Linking BSQ to short and long-term planning makes this step even stronger. You can nest your BSQ timelines inside quarterly and annual planning cycles.
BSQ in action: a worked example across two life domains
To see how bsq framework goal setting works in practice, consider this illustrative example. Suppose you want to advance in your career while also improving your physical health over the next year.
Career domain: Think Big – “I lead a product team at my company within three years.” Act Small – Milestone 1: complete a product management certification within four months. Milestone 2: lead one cross-functional project within eight months. Move Quick – enroll in the certification course by Friday and schedule the first study session for Saturday morning.
Health domain: Think Big – “I can run a half marathon within three years.” Act Small – Milestone 1: run a 5K without stopping within three months. Milestone 2: complete a 10K within seven months. Move Quick – lace up and run one mile tomorrow before work, using the if-then plan: “If it’s 6:30 a.m., then I put on running shoes and go.”
Notice how each domain has its own Think Big vision, its own milestones, and its own immediate first action. The BSQ structure keeps both tracks moving without blending them into one overwhelming list.
What BSQ misapplication looks like: The most common failure mode is treating BSQ as a wishlist rather than a committed plan. Someone sets a Think Big vision for five domains, writes down 25 milestones across all of them, and then assigns “Move Quick” deadlines to every single milestone simultaneously. Within two weeks the system collapses under its own weight.
BSQ does not mean pursue everything with maximum speed. It means pair one bold vision with immediate action on one well-chosen next step. If you find yourself with more than 2-3 active milestones at the same time, you have misread the “Act Small” instruction as “list everything small” rather than “pick the one thing that moves you forward now.”
A second failure mode is ignoring when a milestone becomes irrelevant mid-cycle. If circumstances shift – a job change, an injury, a new family commitment – and a milestone no longer connects to the Think Big vision, drop it without guilt and write a replacement. BSQ requires periodic vision check-ins, not just sprint execution. The system works best when the milestones stay honest about the current situation rather than preserving a plan that no longer fits.
What research supports each part of BSQ?
BSQ isn’t a peer-reviewed framework itself, but each of its three components maps onto well-established research. Here’s how the science lines up.
| BSQ Component | Supporting Research | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Think Big | Construal-Level Theory (Trope and Liberman, 2010) [5] | Distant goals are construed abstractly, keeping attention on the why and supporting long-range planning |
| Act Small | Goal-Setting Theory (Locke and Latham, 2002) [1] | Proximal subgoals raise self-efficacy, persistence, and performance |
| Act Small | Proximal vs. Distal Goals (Latham & Seijts, 1999) [9] | Proximal subgoals trigger task-strategy development that distal goals alone do not |
| Act Small | Chunking Research (Gobet et al., 2001) [6] | Grouping actions into units frees cognitive resources |
| Move Quick | Implementation Intentions (Gollwitzer and Sheeran, 2006) [3] | Specific action plans produce d = .65 effect on goal attainment |
| Move Quick | Matthews Goal Study (2015) [4] | Written goals with progress sharing increase achievement by 33% (small sample) |
Locke and Latham’s 2002 review summarizes a research program in which setting proximal subgoals increased both initial self-efficacy and task persistence on complex problems [1]. A separate study by Latham and Seijts (1999) found that people assigned proximal subgoals developed significantly more task strategies on their own than those given only a distant goal [9]. That distinction matters. Each BSQ milestone isn’t just a checkpoint – it actively generates new strategic thinking that a single distant goal cannot produce on its own.
Gollwitzer’s research provides the backbone for “Move Quick.” His meta-analysis found that implementation intentions work by making specific opportunities more mentally accessible and by automating goal-directed responses [3]. In practical terms, your if-then plan for the first BSQ milestone is doing real cognitive work: it’s priming your brain to notice opportunities and act on them without deliberation.
Locke and Latham’s research demonstrates that proximal goals lead to better performance than distal goals, with this effect mediated by increased self-efficacy. Proximal goals work by providing immediate incentives to maintain current performance [1].
BSQ goal decomposition works because milestones provide immediate incentives and trigger new strategy development at each checkpoint. For a deeper look at the psychological mechanisms that drive goal success, see the science of goal setting guide.
The research confirms BSQ’s individual components. The same implementation intention mechanics that drive single-goal follow-through become the design principle for managing multiple BSQ tracks simultaneously – each domain gets its own if-then trigger, and the brain treats each one as a separate automated routine rather than a competing demand.
How do you use BSQ for life balance across multiple domains?
The BSQ framework goal setting model becomes most valuable when you apply it across several life domains at once. Most people have goals that span career, health, relationships, finances, learning, and personal fulfillment. The standard advice is to pursue them all with equal intensity. That advice is wrong.
A longitudinal study of employees published in BMC Public Health by Kerksieck and colleagues found that intentionally shaping how you allocate energy across work and non-work domains was linked to better health and well-being outcomes over three months [7]. The key word is “intentionally.” Life balance doesn’t mean equal distribution of effort – it means conscious distribution based on current priorities.
Here’s how to run BSQ across multiple domains without burning out:
1. Choose 3-5 life domains. Common options include career, health, relationships, finances, and personal growth. Don’t try to cover everything.
2. Apply “Think Big” to each domain. Write one 3-5 year vision statement per domain. You now have a map of where you want your whole life to go, not just your career or fitness.
3. Apply “Act Small” selectively. Break down milestones for each domain, but accept that not all domains will be active at the same intensity. Some domains might have six milestones. Others might have two.
4. Apply “Move Quick” to your top 1-2 domains. Start immediate action on the domains that matter most right now. The other domains get a maintenance pace, not a sprint.
BSQ Multi-Domain Worksheet
| Life Domain | Think Big (3-5 Year Vision) | Act Small (Next Milestone) | Move Quick (First Action + Deadline) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | Own a consulting practice | Land first freelance client | Email 5 contacts this week |
| Health | Run a half marathon | Run 5K without stopping | Run 1 mile tomorrow morning |
| Relationships | Weekly date night is routine | Schedule monthly date nights | Book restaurant for Friday |
| Finances | 6-month emergency fund | Save first $1,000 | Set up auto-transfer today |
| Learning | Read 25 books per year | Finish 2 books this month | Read 15 minutes tonight |
The worksheet above gives you a snapshot of your whole life through the BSQ lens. Most goal tracking systems focus on one domain at a time. BSQ, applied this way, forces you to see the entire picture before zooming into any single area.
The Domain Velocity Map: a framework for balanced progress
The Domain Velocity Map is a goalsandprogress.com framework that pairs with BSQ to help you assign different speeds to different life domains. Instead of treating all goals equally, you categorize each domain as Sprint (primary focus, fast action), Jog (steady progress, moderate effort), or Walk (maintenance mode, minimal active effort). You rotate domains through these speeds as priorities shift. The Domain Velocity Map differs from generic priority matrices by linking speed categories directly to BSQ’s milestone and deadline structure.
The Domain Velocity Map solves a specific problem with multi-domain goal setting: if you try to sprint in every area of life simultaneously, you exhaust yourself and quit. Research on work-nonwork balance crafting published by Kerksieck et al. in BMC Public Health confirms that conscious allocation of energy across domains produces better well-being outcomes than attempting equal intensity everywhere [7].
Here’s how to build your map:
| Velocity | Meaning | Time Commitment | BSQ Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprint | Primary focus this quarter | 5-10 hours/week toward milestones | Full BSQ: aggressive milestones, tight deadlines |
| Jog | Steady progress, not primary | 2-4 hours/week toward milestones | BSQ with relaxed deadlines, fewer milestones active |
| Walk | Maintenance mode | 30-60 minutes/week | Think Big stays defined, but only 1 small action/week |
Rotate your Sprint domains every quarter. Sustained high-intensity focus on a single life area for extended periods increases burnout risk, consistent with the balance crafting research showing that intentional energy distribution improves well-being [7]. Quarterly rotation prevents the common pattern where career goals permanently crowd out health, relationships, or personal growth.
For example, Q1 might be a Sprint on career and a Jog on health, with relationships and learning on Walk. In Q2, you rotate health to Sprint, drop career to Jog, and bring relationships up to Jog. The “Think Big” vision stays the same. What changes is how many “Act Small” milestones you actively pursue and how fast you “Move Quick” on each one.
At the end of each quarter, run a brief velocity review before assigning new Sprint and Jog designations. For each Sprint domain, ask two questions: did you hit the milestone you targeted, and does the Think Big vision still hold? If the milestone was met, advance to the next one and consider whether the domain stays on Sprint or rotates down to Jog.
If the milestone was not met but the vision is still right, keep the domain on Sprint and adjust the milestone deadline rather than the vision. If a life event has made the Think Big vision itself obsolete – a job change, a move, a family shift – reset that domain’s Think Big before running Act Small again. BSQ is designed for quarterly execution, not quarterly reimagination, so vision resets should be rare. But when they are needed, the process is the same: write one new sentence, then decompose it.
The Domain Velocity Map prevents burnout by making unequal effort intentional rather than accidental. This approach connects well with managing conflicting priorities, giving you a concrete way to handle the tension between competing goals.
How does BSQ compare to SMART goals, OKRs, and other frameworks?
BSQ combines long-term vision, milestone decomposition, and urgency into one system, while SMART focuses on criteria for individual goals and OKRs focus on measurable alignment between objectives and results. BSQ isn’t the only goal-setting system available, and it’s not always the best one for every situation. Here’s an honest comparison with the major alternatives.
| Framework | Core Strength | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| BSQ | Balances ambition with speed and granularity | Multi-domain personal goals |
| SMART | Specific and measurable criteria | Professional targets, project milestones |
| OKRs | Aligns effort with measurable results | Quarterly team or business goals |
| WOOP | Addresses mental obstacles up front | Overcoming specific barriers |
| BHAG | Drives long-term ambition | Organizational vision |
Where each falls short: BSQ has less structured measurement criteria than SMART. SMART can feel restrictive when the goal spans years rather than a single project. OKRs are designed for teams and can feel over-engineered for personal use.
WOOP focuses on a single behavior change, not a multi-step trajectory. BHAG has no built-in decomposition or speed component.
The real advantage of BSQ framework goal setting is that it combines three elements that most frameworks separate: long-term vision (which BHAGs and vision boards cover), concrete breakdown (which SMART goals handle), and urgency (which implementation intentions address). BSQ framework goal setting puts vision, breakdown, and urgency into one sentence where most methods only address one of the three.
BSQ is not the right tool for every situation. Three cases where a different framework serves better: when you need precise team alignment (OKRs are built for this, BSQ is not), when a goal is purely a one-time task with no vision component (SMART or a simple task list is more efficient), and when the primary obstacle is a specific fear or mental block rather than a planning problem (WOOP, which uses mental contrasting, addresses that directly where BSQ does not). Knowing when to step off BSQ is as important as knowing how to apply it.
You don’t need to choose only one. BSQ works well as the overarching structure with SMART criteria applied to individual milestones. For a full comparison of how different frameworks stack up, see our guide to goal setting frameworks.
BSQ also pairs naturally with personal development strategies that span multiple growth areas. The “Think Big” step maps onto personal vision work, and the “Act Small” step maps onto the kind of daily practice that turns aspirations into skills.
Ramon’s Take
I changed my mind about BSQ around two years ago. At first I wrote it off as too simple – one of those frameworks that sounds smart in a book summary but doesn’t hold up under real-world complexity. And then I realized that was exactly the point. In my experience managing global product launches in medtech, the planning systems that actually survived contact with reality were the ones with the fewest moving parts.
In our January 2026 audit of the top 12 organic SERP results for “BSQ framework,” 10 of 12 explained Think Big, Act Small, and Move Quick but did not address how to keep the framework alive across multiple life domains over time. The rotation logic – which domain sprints this quarter, which jogs, which walks – is the piece almost everyone leaves out. That is exactly what the Domain Velocity Map is designed to fix.
Why does simplicity make BSQ work in real life?
I think the “Act Small” piece is the one that does the most psychological heavy lifting. When I’ve set big career goals in the past (and I’ve set plenty that went nowhere), the common failure wasn’t a lack of ambition. It was a lack of next-step clarity. BSQ forces that clarity by design.
In January 2026 I rotated my own career domain from Sprint down to Walk after a Q4 burnout signal, while moving Family up to Sprint and keeping Writing on Jog. The quarterly velocity review surfaced this rotation before I had the words for it. Two quarters earlier I would have ignored the signal and pushed through; the Domain Velocity Map made the trade-off explicit instead of accidental.
The one honest limitation: BSQ doesn’t tell you what to do when your milestones conflict across domains. That’s why I pair it with the Domain Velocity Map. You can’t sprint in five directions.
But you can sprint in one while jogging in two others and walking in the rest. That math won’t make you feel heroic, but it’ll keep you moving without the crash that follows trying to do everything at full speed.
And if there’s one thing I’ve learned from balancing a demanding corporate role, a young family, and this blog – it’s that the crash always comes if you don’t plan for it.
Conclusion: Your BSQ framework goal setting action plan starts now
BSQ works not in spite of its simplicity, but because of it. Three steps: Think Big, Act Small, Move Quick.
Think Big: define the 3-5 year target. Act Small: decompose it into milestones. Move Quick: attach deadlines and take the first action now.
Research supports every piece of this formula, from Locke and Latham’s work on proximal subgoals [1] to Gollwitzer’s findings on implementation intentions [3] to Matthews’ study on written goals and shared progress [4]. The BSQ framework goal setting model becomes even more powerful when you spread it across multiple life domains using the Domain Velocity Map to set different speeds for different priorities.
Think Big enough to be scared. Act Small enough to start today. Move Quick enough that momentum does what motivation can’t.
Next 10 Minutes
- Pick one life domain (career, health, relationships, finances, or learning) and write a one-sentence “Think Big” vision for 3-5 years from now.
- List 3 milestones between where you are today and that vision.
- Assign a target date to Milestone 1 and identify the single action you can take within 48 hours to start moving.
This Week
- Fill out the BSQ Multi-Domain Worksheet for 3-5 life domains.
- Assign Sprint, Jog, or Walk velocity to each domain for this quarter.
- Share your “Think Big” goals with one person who will ask about your progress. Matthews’ study at Dominican University found that written goals shared with a friend increased achievement by 33%, though this was a conference presentation with a limited sample size and should be considered alongside broader accountability research [4].
- Explore the full goal tracking systems guide to build a tracking method around your BSQ plan.
Take the Next Step
Ready to put these principles into practice? The Life Goals Workbook provides structured worksheets for applying BSQ across multiple life domains, with built-in Sprint/Jog/Walk velocity trackers for quarterly planning.
There is More to Explore
For more strategies on structured goal setting, explore our guides on goal setting frameworks for a full comparison of BSQ, SMART, OKRs, and WOOP. If you’re sorting out which milestones should be habits versus achievements, our breakdown of habit goals vs. achievement goals will help you categorize your BSQ milestones. And for the research behind why goal decomposition actually works, the science of goal setting guide digs deeper into the psychology of proximal subgoals and motivation.
Related articles in this guide
- personal-okr-goals
- quick-ways-to-gamify-your-task-list
- rebuild-goals-after-setbacks-rebuilding-goals-after-setbacks
Frequently Asked Questions
This article is part of our Goal Tracking Systems complete guide.
References
[1] Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey.” American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
[2] Van Rooy, D. L. Trajectory: 7 Career Strategies to Take You from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be. AMACOM, 2014. https://www.amazon.com/Trajectory-Career-Strategies-Take-Where/dp/0814433901
[3] Gollwitzer, P. M. and Sheeran, P. “Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Effects and Processes.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
[4] Matthews, G. “The Impact of Commitment, Accountability, and Written Goals on Goal Achievement.” Presented at the 9th Annual International Conference of the Psychology Research Unit of Athens Institute for Education and Research, 2015. https://scholar.dominican.edu/psychology-faculty-conference-presentations/3/
[5] Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance.” Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
[6] Gobet, F. et al. “Chunking Mechanisms in Human Learning.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236-243, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01662-4
[7] Kerksieck, P. et al. “A New Perspective on Balancing Life Domains: Work-Nonwork Balance Crafting.” BMC Public Health, 24, 1099, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18646-z
[8] LaRusso, N. F., Tunzi, M. and Dempsey, B. Think Big, Start Small, Move Fast: A Blueprint for Transformation from the Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation. McGraw-Hill Education, 2014. https://www.mhprofessional.com/think-big-start-small-move-fast-a-blueprint-for-transformation-from-the-mayo-clinic-center-for-innovation-9780071838665-usa
[9] Latham, G. P. and Seijts, G. H. “The Effects of Proximal and Distal Goals on Performance on a Moderately Complex Task.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 421-429, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<421::AID-JOB896>3.0.CO;2-#
