Deep Work Environment: Creating Your Space for Maximum Focus

Why your deep work environment keeps winning the battle your willpower loses

A deep work environment is not a luxury you build once you have the discipline — it is the structure that makes discipline unnecessary in the first place. Your brain does not fight its surroundings and win. It accommodates them. When your phone sits face-up on the desk, you check it. When your inbox tab is pinned next to your document, you read it. When your desk has seventeen sticky notes and an empty coffee mug from Tuesday, your visual cortex registers all of it as unfinished business, even while you are trying to write. Gloria Mark’s research at UC Irvine found that knowledge workers switch attention roughly every three minutes (Mark, Gudith, & Klocke, 2008), and that recovering full focus after a single interruption takes an average of twenty-three minutes and fifteen seconds. That is the real cost of a poorly designed environment: not the distraction itself, but the compounding recovery time that follows it.

This article gives you a concrete, layer-by-layer system called Focus Environment Architecture. Three layers — physical, digital, and cognitive — each with specific setup steps, each grounded in what the evidence actually supports rather than what productivity blogs have been repeating for a decade. Some techniques that dominate the conversation (standing desks for cognition, binaural beats, blue-light glasses for evening work) are hedged or cut here because the evidence does not hold up under scrutiny. Others you may have dismissed — notification batching, a formal shutdown ritual, 90-minute blocks over 25-minute Pomodoros — are given the space they deserve.

Who this article is for

This guide is for knowledge workers who already understand what deep work is and are frustrated that their actual working conditions do not support it. You have read Newport or heard the term. You have tried closing the browser, silencing your phone, or blocking off morning time on your calendar — and watched the habit dissolve within two weeks. You work in an open-plan office, a home with other people in it, a coffee shop, or some mix of all three depending on the day. You are not looking for a theory lecture. You want to know what to move, what to block, what to schedule, and in what order — starting today, with the setup you already have.

What you will learn

• The Focus Environment Architecture framework and why three layers matter more than any single tactic
• Which physical setup variables have real evidence behind them (and which are productivity folklore)
• How to configure your digital environment so it stops working against you by default
• Why 90-minute blocks outperform 25-minute Pomodoros for deep cognitive work, and how to build the rituals that bookend them
• Specific adaptations for open-plan offices, home setups, and cafes
• What to do on the days the system collapses
• A decision-logic table for the tools that actually earn their place in the stack

Key takeaways

• The 23-minute recovery cost changes everything. Every interruption your environment allows carries a hidden price tag that compounds across the day. The goal is not zero distractions — it is raising the friction high enough that interruptions become rare rather than constant.
• Three layers, not one. A cleared desk without blocked notifications is like a noise-cancelling headphone without the seal. Physical, digital, and cognitive layers each close a different failure mode. Fixing only one of them is why most setups do not hold.
• 90-minute blocks have stronger physiological support than 25-minute Pomodoros for sustaining deep cognitive work. Pomodoro suits beginners or fragmented schedules; ultradian-aligned 90-minute blocks suit practitioners who can protect the time.
• Noise-cancelling headphones are the single highest-return physical investment. Standing desks, in contrast, have weak evidence for cognitive performance specifically. Buy the headphones first.
• The shutdown ritual is not optional. Newport’s “shutdown complete” concept closes the cognitive loop that keeps unfinished-task noise running in the background during non-work hours. It is the least-adopted and most underrated part of the system.

Focus Environment Architecture: a three-layer system

The reason most deep work setups fail is not lack of motivation. It is single-layer thinking. You clear the desk but leave notifications on. You block social media but keep your phone face-up on the table. You hold a 90-minute calendar block and then let a colleague interrupt at minute fourteen. Newport’s foundational observation in Deep Work (2016) is that concentration is a skill cultivated in conditions — and the conditions matter as much as the intention. Focus Environment Architecture organizes those conditions into three layers: physical, digital, and cognitive. Think of it as building three walls around your attention. One wall is not a room.

The layers are also ordered by cost to change. The physical layer is mostly a one-time rearrangement that takes an afternoon. The digital layer takes roughly an hour of configuration that pays forward indefinitely. The cognitive layer requires the most ongoing practice but produces the deepest returns once the habit solidifies. The “your next 10 minutes” section at the end tells you where to start — you will not be asked to do all three layers today.

Phase 1: The physical layer — desk, light, sound, and temperature

The physical layer is everything you can see, hear, and feel during a work session. Most people underestimate how much their visual field is doing in the background. A 2011 study from Princeton Neuroscience Institute found that visual stimuli compete directly for neural resources — physical objects in your line of sight are not passively ignored, they actively suppress processing capacity for the task in front of you (McMains & Kastner, 2011). This is the neurological argument for a cleared work surface. It is not about aesthetics.

Desk surface and visual field

The “clean desk, clear mind” idea has a real neurological basis (McMains & Kastner, 2011), but “clean” does not mean sterile. What matters is that every object within your visual field during a work session either belongs to the current task or belongs out of sight. A reference book you are actively consulting is fine. Last week’s printed invoice, a charger cable going nowhere, and a post-it wall covering the monitor surround are all competing for neural bandwidth you cannot spare. The practical test: sit down, look straight ahead, then scan left and right at a natural head-turn angle. Remove everything in that arc that is not part of today’s work before you start.

Lighting

Natural light access matters more than most desks account for. A global survey of 7,600 workers across 16 countries — led by Professor Sir Cary Cooper and commissioned by Interface’s Human Spaces initiative (2015) — found that employees in workplaces with natural light reported being 6% more productive and 15% more creative and higher in wellbeing compared to those in artificially lit environments. The 6% productivity figure is modest but was replicated across a large international sample. If you have a window, orient your desk so light comes from the side (not behind the screen, which creates glare, and not directly in front of you, which causes eye strain during glare-heavy periods). If you work in an interior office, a daylight-temperature desk lamp (5,000-6,500K) partially substitutes.

On blue-light glasses for evening work: the evidence is genuinely contested. Multiple randomized trials have found little to no difference in sleep quality between blue-light-filtering lenses and standard lenses. The American Academy of Ophthalmology does not recommend them for this purpose. The most consistent recommendation for evening screen work is reducing screen brightness and keeping the room reasonably lit, so the monitor is not the dominant light source, rather than relying on a filter product. This guide is not recommending blue-light glasses.

Sound and noise control

Noise is not a peripheral concern. A 2015 World Green Building Council report found that noise is the most commonly cited factor negatively affecting office concentration, and that open-office noise can reduce productivity by up to 66% on tasks requiring sustained attention (World Green Building Council, 2015). The interventions with consistent support:

• Noise-cancelling headphones. This is the single most-supported physical investment for open-plan or shared environments. Active noise cancellation reduces background distraction significantly, and the headphones themselves serve as a social signal that reduces interruptions. That signal effect — “do not interrupt this person” — has value independent of the audio you play through them.
• Moderate ambient noise (~70 dB). Mehta, Zhu, and Cheema (2012) in the Journal of Consumer Research found that moderate background noise, roughly the level of a busy coffee shop, slightly enhanced creative task performance compared to silence or high noise. The effect size was small and the tasks were creativity-focused rather than deep analytical work. If ambient café sounds help you personally, there is a plausible mechanism. Silence works equally well for many people; choose what works for you without treating either as a productivity hack.
• Lo-fi beats and binaural beats. The neuroscience evidence here is thin. Small studies suggest mild effects on mood and arousal, but no strong evidence shows they outperform matched white noise or silence for deep cognitive performance. Use them if you like the subjective experience; do not expect a documented focus boost.

Temperature

Office temperature research consistently supports a range of 68-76 degrees Fahrenheit (20-24 degrees Celsius) for cognitive performance. Cornell University ergonomics research (Alan Hedge, 2004) and OSHA guidelines both fall within this range. Cold environments tend to increase error rates; very warm environments impair sustained attention. If you control your thermostat, stay in that range. If you do not — open-plan office, shared space — a small desk fan or an additional layer of clothing narrows the problem considerably.

Screens: single ultrawide vs. dual monitor

The dual-monitor setup that dominated workstation advice in the 2010s is worth reconsidering. A single large ultrawide display (34-38 inches, 21:9 ratio) with virtual desktops often works better for deep work: one virtual desktop per active project, full-screen applications per desk, and no temptation of a permanently visible email or Slack window on the second screen. The dual-monitor layout tends to turn the second screen into a distraction surface by design — the email client lives there, the Slack sidebar lives there, and both sit in your peripheral vision during work sessions. There is no peer-reviewed research that settles this question definitively. The guidance is practical: configure whichever setup you have so that your communication tools are one desktop-switch away, not always visible.

Standing desks: hedged

Standing desks are genuinely useful for reducing sedentary time and some back discomfort; systematic reviews support that. They are not a cognitive performance tool in any current well-controlled study. The wave of “standing improves focus and creativity” claims from 2015 to 2017 was driven largely by observational and correlational data, not controlled experiments. If you are investing in a standing desk for health reasons, that is reasonable. If you expect a measurable focus improvement, the evidence does not currently support that specific claim. The cognitive benefits attributed to standing are more plausibly explained by the movement breaks than the standing posture itself.

Phase 2: The digital layer — notifications, blocking, and screen hygiene

The physical layer gets your body in the right place. The digital layer stops your devices from undoing that work the moment you open them. Most people configure their devices for maximum responsiveness — every notification enabled, every app visible, every communication channel a single click away. That configuration serves other people’s schedules. Building a deep work environment means reconfiguring that default so your devices serve your schedule.

Phone visibility

Ward and colleagues at the University of Texas at Austin (2017) found that the mere presence of a smartphone on a desk reduced available cognitive capacity, even when the phone was face-down and silent. The proposed mechanism is that the brain allocates active suppression effort to the known distraction source, reducing resources available for the task. A 2022 replication study (Ruiz Pardo & Minda) found mixed results and did not fully reproduce the effect at the same magnitude. The most consistently supported intervention across both studies is removing the phone from the room entirely. “Out of sight but nearby” is where the evidence splits; “out of the room” is where it converges. If you cannot physically remove it, inside a closed bag or a drawer you cannot see is the next-best option.

Notification batching

Mark and colleagues (2016, Microsoft Research) found that knowledge workers who process email in defined batches rather than reactively throughout the day report lower stress and higher perceived productivity. The mechanism links directly to attention residue: every notification response generates residue on the communication task that contaminates the subsequent deep work attempt. Batching collapses all that residue into a contained window. A workable default: two or three email and Slack windows per day — morning, post-lunch, late afternoon — each no longer than 30 minutes. Disable all notification banners, sounds, and badge counts on your computer and phone during every other period. Your distraction management system starts with this one configuration change.

Website blockers during work blocks

Blocking distracting websites during a work block is one of the most practical digital interventions available. Mark and colleagues (2016, Microsoft Research) found that when knowledge workers reduced reactive email and communication checking through scheduled batching and deliberate blocking, they reported lower stress and higher perceived productivity — and a broader line of focus research (Mark et al., 2017, CSCW) confirms that the same reactive checking patterns are a primary source of workday stress. The critical design point: blocking works best as a scheduled system (the blocker activates automatically at your work block start time) rather than a willpower-triggered one (you turn it on when you notice yourself getting distracted, which is already too late). Configure it to run at the same time every day, for the full duration of your deep work block. The scheduling is the feature.

Phase 3: The cognitive layer — block length, rituals, and the shutdown

The cognitive layer is where most people have the most room to improve and where the productivity-blog advice is most inconsistent. Two questions dominate the conversation: how long should a deep work block actually be, and how do you start and close a session in a way that turns it from an aspiration into a habit?

Block length: 25 minutes vs. 90 minutes

The Pomodoro Technique (25 minutes on, 5 minutes off) is well-known and genuinely useful as a starting point for people new to structured focus practice or working in heavily fragmented environments. But there is a better-grounded option for knowledge workers who can protect longer stretches of time.

Chronobiologist Nathaniel Kleitman, best known for co-discovering REM sleep, also identified what he called the basic rest-activity cycle: a roughly 90-minute oscillation of higher and lower alertness that operates throughout the waking day, not just at night. Later work by sleep researcher Peretz Lavie, and performance researchers Jim Loehr and Tony Schwartz, popularized the implication: sustained deep cognitive work aligns more naturally with a 90-minute window than a 25-minute one, because the underlying neurological rhythm is approximately that length. The DeskTime time-tracking analysis (2014) of its top 10% most productive users found those workers averaged 52 minutes of focused work followed by 17-minute breaks — a ratio shorter than 90 minutes but pointing in the same direction: longer sustained focus, not 25-minute fragments, was what characterized the most productive performers in their data.

The practical recommendation: if you are new to sustained focus work, start with 50-minute blocks (easier to protect than 90 minutes on a full calendar). Once those feel comfortable and your environment is well-configured, extend to 90 minutes. If your workday is highly fragmented by meetings, two back-to-back 50-minute blocks with a 10-minute break between them is a reasonable alternative. Pair this with a time-blocking method that fits your calendar, so the 90-minute slot is defended before the day fills with drop-in meetings. Do not force Pomodoro intervals if your work naturally wants longer runs — you are interrupting yourself at the worst moment.

The start ritual

How you enter a work block determines how quickly you get into it. Implementation intention research by Peter Gollwitzer (1999) showed that specific “when X happens, I will do Y” plans dramatically increase follow-through on intended behaviors compared to general goals. Applied to deep work: instead of “I will focus in the mornings,” the plan is “when I sit down at my desk at 8:30am, I will put on my headphones, open only the document for the current task, and set a timer for 90 minutes.” That specificity is not pedantry — it is the mechanism that converts intention into behavior.

A useful five-step start ritual: clear the desk surface, put the phone away, start the website blocker, open only the one file or tool the session requires, and set a visible timer. The whole sequence takes about two minutes. After a few weeks of consistent use, the sequence itself becomes the cue that shifts your brain into work mode — the ritual is doing cognitive priming work that willpower alone cannot match.

The shutdown ritual

Newport’s “shutdown complete” phrase from Deep Work (2016) describes a ritual for closing the workday: review what was done, capture any open loops in a trusted system, confirm the next-day plan, and then say the phrase aloud or type it as a written signal that work is genuinely closed. The neurological purpose is cognitive offloading — moving unfinished-task information out of working memory and into an external system so your brain is not running background maintenance threads on it during non-work hours. This explains why many people feel anxious or unable to relax in the evenings: the tasks have not been transferred to a trusted capture system, so the brain keeps them active as an insurance policy.

Deep work by environment type

Generic advice assumes a private room with a door and a window. Most knowledge workers do not have that consistently. The FEA framework adapts to three real-world conditions.

Open-plan offices

The open plan is the hardest environment for deep work, and the WGBC noise data (2015) explains why. Your primary levers: noise-cancelling headphones as a physical and social barrier; website and notification blockers that prevent digital pull; and calendar holds that communicate — before the workday starts — that this block is not available for drop-ins. Some organizations respond well to a “deep work signal” norm: headphones plus a “do not interrupt” desk indicator or Slack status. If yours will, establishing that norm is a conversation worth having explicitly with your team. If your role requires frequent availability, the Journalistic philosophy from Newport (2016) is the most realistic: shorter, protected blocks slotted around your reactive obligations rather than a single four-hour stretch. The key is that the block is scheduled and defended, even if it is only 50 minutes.

Home office

The home environment’s problem is boundary collapse: the space that houses your work also houses everything that competes with it. Three adaptations that help: a spatial cue (a dedicated work area, even if just a specific chair and table, that is only used for work), a temporal cue (a consistent start and end time that the rest of your household understands), and a commute substitute (a five-minute walk, a specific playlist, or any brief ritual between “home mode” and “work mode” that functions as a context switch). Digital minimalism principles apply particularly well here: devices in a home environment default to their most distracting configurations unless you actively change them.

Cafes and coworking spaces

For some people, the moderate ambient noise and social presence of a coffee shop genuinely helps (Mehta et al., 2012). Environmental novelty can also boost creative-mode thinking. The practical issue: cafes are unpredictable. The ambient noise study found benefits at roughly 70 dB — a calm coffee shop on a Tuesday morning. A packed lunch rush at 85 dB is a different story. Use noise-cancelling headphones regardless. Treat the cafe as a supplement for the right kind of work (brainstorming, writing first drafts, tasks that benefit from mild arousal) rather than a substitute for your configured primary environment when you need deep analytical work.

What to do when the environment breaks down

Systems fail. The meeting over-ran and ate your morning block. The team had a fire drill. Your child is home sick. The coffee shop is inexplicably playing live music at 11am. Treating any of these as a reason to abandon the rest of the day is the most expensive mistake a deep work practitioner makes. The goal on a broken day is not to recover the original plan; it is to salvage the minimum viable session.

A minimum viable session is any protected block of at least 30 minutes where all three layers are engaged: phone out of reach, notifications off, a single task open. Thirty minutes of real focus outperforms a full afternoon of fragmented effort on most cognitively demanding work. Research by Altmann, Trafton, and Hambrick at Michigan State (2014) found that even a 2.8-second interruption doubles the error rate on complex cognitive tasks — meaning that a continuous 30-minute block is genuinely more productive than 90 minutes of repeatedly interrupted work.

When the environment breaks down, run through this one-action-per-layer recovery checklist:

• Physical layer: put the phone in a bag or another room. Close the door or put on headphones. This takes 60 seconds.
• Digital layer: close everything except the one window you need. If the blocker is not active, activate it now. Two minutes.
• Cognitive layer: pick the one specific task for this salvage session. Write it at the top of a note. Set a timer for whatever time you have — even 25 minutes. Start.

Do not reschedule the session for “later when it is calmer.” Later when it is calmer rarely arrives. The salvage session right now is the best option available.

Ramon’s Take

Ramon Landes here, the author of this guide. For two years I ran a dual-monitor setup because that is what every desk tour on YouTube showed. Two screens, my email and Slack on the left monitor, the work document on the right. I thought I was being efficient. What I was actually doing was building a distraction infrastructure that sat within my peripheral vision for eight hours a day. The pattern I noticed: every single morning around 9:45am, my eyes drifted to the unread badge on Slack on the left screen, the writing block dissolved, and the next 23 minutes were gone before I noticed. I switched to a single ultrawide with one virtual desktop per active project, Slack and email moved to a second virtual desktop I had to consciously switch to, and the first week felt wrong because I could not “check” anything at a glance anymore. That was the point. The discomfort was the system working. The deeper lesson I took from rebuilding this environment a few times is that the test of a good setup is not how productive you feel on the first day you use it — it is how automatic it becomes by week three. If you are still negotiating with yourself over whether to put your phone in the other room, the setup is still costing you willpower it should not need. Build until the environment makes the right choice the default. That is when you stop fighting it.

Tools that help

The best tool stack for a deep work environment is a short one. Every tool you add has a setup cost, a learning curve, and a distraction surface of its own. The following table uses decision logic rather than a ranked list — the right tool depends on your specific failure mode.

Tool category	Best for	Evidence quality	Skip if
Noise-cancelling headphones (Sony WH-1000XM5, Bose QC45, Apple AirPods Pro)	Open-plan offices; anyone with unpredictable ambient noise; as a social “do not interrupt” signal	Strong. Noise reduces productivity up to 66% on focus tasks (WGBC, 2015); ANC directly addresses this.	You work alone in a reliably quiet space. Even then, useful for signal to household members.
Website blocker with scheduling (Freedom, Cold Turkey, Focus)	Anyone who checks social media or news reflexively during work sessions	Good. Mark et al. (2016) Microsoft Research found that scheduled batching and reduced reactive checking lowered stress and raised perceived productivity. No peer-reviewed study confirms a specific “50% task-switch reduction” claim that floats around productivity blogs.	Your distraction is internal (mind-wandering rather than tab-switching). Blocking helps with impulse checks, not with restlessness.
Time-blocking calendar (Google Calendar, Fantastical, structured paper)	Protecting deep work blocks before the day fills with meetings; visualizing the week’s focus budget	Strong. Newport (2016) treats time-blocking as the core scheduling practice for deep work. Solid practitioner evidence.	Your schedule is entirely self-directed. Still useful, but less urgent without external meeting pressure.
Note capture / scratch pad (Notion, Bear, a physical notebook)	Capturing intrusive thoughts during a work block without switching tasks; logging ideas without opening a browser	Supported by cognitive offloading research. The act of writing externalizes the mental loop that would otherwise interrupt the session.	You work best with zero open apps. A physical notebook is better than a digital capture tool for maximum focus.
Ambient noise app (Spotify ambient playlists; Brain.fm)	Open-plan workers who cannot use full silence; café-equivalent background when working from home	Moderate. Mehta et al. (2012) found ~70 dB ambient noise slightly benefits creative tasks. The effect was small and applied to creative cognition rather than deep analytical work, so do not treat it as a focus hack.	You already have noise-cancelling headphones and prefer silence or familiar music. Do not add a tool for a solved problem.
Shutdown checklist app (Sunsama, Akiflow, a recurring note in Apple Notes or Notion)	Anyone who keeps thinking about work after the workday ends; people whose evenings feel low-grade anxious despite leaving the desk	Practical. Newport (2016) describes the shutdown ritual as cognitive offloading. The mechanism aligns with attention-residue research (Leroy, 2009) — moving open loops out of working memory into a trusted system reduces background mental load.	You already have a reliable end-of-day capture habit and a clear signal that work is finished. The app is just structure for a behavior; the behavior is the point.

How Claude Co-Work helps

Setting up a deep work environment is a one-time configuration task, but maintaining the cognitive layer — planning blocks, clearing capture queues, reviewing what tomorrow needs — is a daily overhead that accumulates. Claude Co-Work can function as an active thinking partner at each layer of the Focus Environment Architecture, reducing the cognitive load of the system maintenance itself.

• Physical layer setup: describe your current desk configuration and work environment; Claude can help you prioritize which changes to make first based on your specific failure modes.
• Digital layer configuration: paste a list of your installed apps and notification settings; Claude can help you triage what to block, batch, and delete, and suggest a notification schedule that matches your role.
• Cognitive layer planning: tell Claude what you need to accomplish this week; it can help you draft a time-blocked schedule, identify which tasks qualify as deep work vs. shallow work, and build a shutdown checklist tailored to your specific list of open loops.
• Recovery on broken days: describe what collapsed and what time you have left; Claude can help you triage a minimum viable session from the available fragments.

Your next 10 minutes and first week

Right now (before you close this tab):

• Put your phone in another room or inside a bag you cannot see. Do this now, not at the start of the next work session.
• Turn off all notification banners and sounds on your computer. Email, Slack, calendar alerts — all of them. Set one check time for this afternoon.
• Identify tomorrow’s first deep work block. Put it on your calendar as a 90-minute hold. Pick one specific task that will fill it.

This week (layer by layer):

• Day 1 — Physical layer: clear your work surface before your next session. Remove everything that is not the current task. Confirm headphones are charged and accessible.
• Day 2 — Digital layer: install a website blocker (Freedom or Cold Turkey). Schedule it to activate automatically at the time of your daily deep work block. Configure it once; do not touch it again.
• Day 3 — Cognitive layer: run your first start ritual (desk clear, phone away, blocker on, one file open, timer set). Then run your first shutdown ritual at end of day (capture open loops, confirm tomorrow’s plan, say “shutdown complete”).
• Day 4-7: repeat the three-layer setup daily. The goal this week is not to optimize — it is to make the sequence automatic. After seven days of consistent use, you will no longer be deciding whether to set up the environment. You will just do it.

Frequently asked questions

There is more to explore

The Focus Environment Architecture system in this article is the physical and configurational layer of a deeper practice. If you want the full framework for scheduling, protecting, and building deep work into a sustainable professional life, the logical next step is the deep work strategies complete guide — the parent of this article, which covers Newport’s four philosophies, how to audit your shallow work obligations, and how to structure a career around cognitive depth rather than constant reactivity. Everything in this article is more effective when it sits inside a deliberately designed work schedule and routine. The deep work schedule and routine article picks up exactly where the cognitive layer section above leaves off.

Two other areas are worth pursuing in parallel. First, if your digital environment specifically feels overwhelming rather than just misconfigured, the digital decluttering guide in our work-life silo covers a four-phase system (Audit, Purge, Organize, Maintain) for the underlying digital organization problem that notification batching alone cannot solve. Second, managing distractions at work and concentration techniques for work both address the behavioral side of focus — what to do when the environment is set up correctly but your own mind is the distraction source. The physical and digital layers protect you from external interruption; concentration techniques address the internal version of the same problem. The philosophy that ties all of it together is in digital minimalism for knowledge workers: a silo entry point that explains why intentional technology use, not more apps or gadgets, is the long-term answer to the attention fragmentation that deep work environments are designed to resist.

References

1. Altmann, E. M., Trafton, J. G., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2014). Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030986
2. DeskTime. (2014). The secret of the 10% most productive people? Breaking! [Internal analysis of time-tracking data]. Retrieved from https://desktime.com/blog/52-17-updated
3. Ruiz Pardo, A. C., & Minda, J. P. (2022). Reexamining the “brain drain” effect: A replication of Ward et al. (2017). Acta Psychologica, 230, 103717. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691822002323
4. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
5. Human Spaces / Interface. (2015). The global impact of biophilic design in the workplace. Survey of 7,600 workers across 16 countries, led by Professor Sir Cary Cooper. Retrieved from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-study-connects-levels-of-employee-productivity-and-well-being-to-office-design-300058034.html
6. Kleitman, N. (1963). Sleep and wakefulness (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
7. Leroy, S. (2009). Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002
8. Loehr, J., & Schwartz, T. (2003). The power of full engagement: Managing energy, not time, is the key to high performance and personal renewal. Free Press.
9. Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 107-110). ACM. Retrieved from https://ics.uci.edu/~gmark/chi08-mark.pdf
10. Mark, G., Iqbal, S., Czerwinski, M., & Johns, P. (2016). Neurotics can’t focus: An in-situ study of online multitasking in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Also: Mark, G., et al. (2016). Email duration, batching and self-interruption. Microsoft Research. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Email20Duration20Camera20Ready20submission3-1.pdf
11. Mark, G., Iqbal, S. T., Czerwinski, M., Johns, P., Sano, A., & Lutchyn, Y. (2017). Email as a source and symbol of stress. In Proceedings of the ACM 2017 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998342
12. McMains, S., & Kastner, S. (2011). Interactions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(2), 587-597. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21228167/
13. Mehta, R., Zhu, R. J., & Cheema, A. (2012). Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784-799. https://doi.org/10.1086/665048
14. Newport, C. (2016). Deep work: Rules for focused success in a distracted world. Grand Central Publishing. Retrieved from https://calnewport.com/deep-work-rules-for-focused-success-in-a-distracted-world/
15. Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
16. World Green Building Council. (2015). Health, wellbeing and productivity in offices: The next chapter for green building. Retrieved from https://worldgbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/compressed_WorldGBC_Health_Wellbeing__Productivity_Full_Report_Dbl_Med_Res_Feb_2015-1.pdf