9 Uncommon Accountability Systems to Keep Habits On Track

Most accountability systems fail because they rely on willpower or a well-meaning friend who checks in sporadically. You know exactly what you should be doing. The workout plan is saved. The morning routine is mapped out. The healthy meal prep containers are stacked in your cabinet. And yet, by Wednesday, the plan has quietly evaporated.

This gap between intention and action is not a character flaw. It is a design problem. The solution is not trying harder. The solution is building systems that keep your behavior visible, trackable, and consequential without requiring constant motivation.

In this guide, you will learn nine uncommon accountability systems that go far beyond the standard buddy system. Each one is grounded in research on habit formation , social support, and behavioral design. Whether you prefer working alone with a simple logbook or thrive on group challenges, you will find a system that fits your personality and goals.

What You’ll Learn

• Why most accountability arrangements fail and which mechanisms actually work
• The psychological levers that make accountability systems effective
• Nine lesser-known accountability systems you can set up without a coach or paid program
• How to match each system to your personality, habit type, and schedule
• How to spot when your accountability system is backfiring
• Answers to common questions about accountability and habit tracking

Key Takeaways

• Accountability systems work best when they make behavior visible, frequent, and easy to track, not just when someone “checks on you.”
• Self-monitoring tools like logbooks and streaks are associated with measurable behavior change in research studies [4].
• Functional social support (practical help, emotional encouragement) is positively associated with better adherence to health behaviors [5].
• Financial stakes and commitment devices can drive short-term change but need careful safeguards to avoid anxiety [9].
• Forming a new habit in daily life can take anywhere from 18 to 254 days, with a median of approximately 66 days [1].
• Monthly accountability audits keep your systems aligned with your life as circumstances change.

Why Most Accountability Fizzles Out (and What Actually Works)

The classic accountability partner arrangement sounds reasonable: find a friend, agree to check in, hold each other responsible. In practice, this setup fails for predictable reasons. Your partner gets busy. Check-ins become sporadic. Neither person wants to be the nag.

The problem is not the people involved. The problem is that informal accountability lacks the specific mechanisms that actually change behavior.

Research on goal achievement points to four core levers that distinguish effective accountability from well-meaning but ineffective arrangements:

• Self-monitoring: Recording your behavior is associated with increased awareness and feedback loops that support change [4]
• Timely feedback: Knowing how you did yesterday (not last month) allows for quick course correction
• Functional social support: Practical and emotional support from others is positively associated with better adherence to health behaviors, while simply having people around (structural support) shows a weaker relationship [5]
• Meaningful stakes: Commitment devices and consequences (social, financial, or otherwise) can raise the perceived cost of skipping

When you understand these mechanisms, you can evaluate any accountability approach by asking: Does this system help me monitor my behavior? Does it give me feedback soon enough to adjust? Does it connect me with real support? Does it create stakes that matter to me?

The nine systems ahead are designed around these levers. Some focus on self-monitoring. Others build in social stakes or financial consequences. The key is matching the mechanism to your personality and the habit you want to build.

The Science Behind Accountability and Habit Stickiness

Before exploring specific systems, it helps to understand why accountability matters most during certain phases of habit formation and what the research actually shows about these mechanisms.

Habit Formation Takes Longer Than You Think

A study on habit formation in daily life found that participants needed anywhere from 18 to 254 days to reach near-automaticity, with a median of approximately 66 days [1]. This wide range means some habits feel automatic within a few weeks, while others require months of consistent repetition. Accountability systems matter most during this early phase, before the behavior becomes self-sustaining.

Research suggests that habit-focused interventions supporting consistent repetition in stable contexts may help with weight control and other health behaviors [2]. Your accountability system does not need to last forever. Its job is to bridge the gap until the behavior feels natural.

Implementation Intentions Boost Follow-Through

Research on implementation intentions (specific “if-then” plans like “If it is 7 a.m. and I have finished breakfast, then I will put on my running shoes”) shows meaningful improvements in goal attainment across many domains. A meta-analysis by Gollwitzer and Sheeran found a medium-to-large effect size (d = 0.65) for implementation intentions compared to control conditions [3].

“Implementation intentions had a positive effect of medium-to-large magnitude (d = 0.65) on goal attainment” [3].

Several systems in this guide (particularly weekly reviews and micro-commitment contracts) use this principle by prompting you to specify exactly when, where, and how you will act.

Self-Monitoring Produces Measurable Change

A systematic review found that interventions using self-monitoring were associated with significant short-term reductions in sedentary behavior among adults [4]. The act of recording what you do (whether in a notebook, app, or spreadsheet) creates awareness and feedback that passive intentions cannot match.

Social Support Predicts Adherence

Meta-analyses show that functional social support (practical help, emotional encouragement) is positively associated with treatment adherence [5]. Separate research found that social support from family, friends, and exercise staff predicts adherence to exercise programs in middle-aged adults [6]. This explains why certain accountability structures (rings, group challenges, public boards) can outperform going it alone when designed well.

Financial Incentives Work (With Caveats)

Loss aversion, described in prospect theory, suggests that people tend to experience losses more intensely than equivalent gains [7]. This psychological tendency makes commitment devices and deposit-based incentives potentially effective for short-term behavior change.

“Participants in deposit contract and lottery incentive groups lost significantly more weight than controls over 16 weeks” [8].

Effects often diminish after incentives end, and not everyone is comfortable with financial stakes. Use this approach thoughtfully.

Goal Setting Amplifies All of This

Specific, challenging goals combined with feedback tend to improve performance more than vague “do your best” goals [9]. Every accountability system in this guide becomes more effective when paired with a clear target: not “exercise more” but “complete three 30-minute workouts this week.” For guidance on setting effective targets, see our goal setting frameworks guide .

9 Uncommon Accountability Systems (and How to Use Them)

The following systems package the mechanisms above into practical setups. Each section explains how the system works, why it works, how to set it up, who it is best for, and what can go wrong.

System 1: The Automated Logbook Method

How it works: You create a physical or digital log where you record one data point each day: did you complete your target habit, yes or no? The log is always visible (on your wall, desk, or phone home screen). Over time, the visual record of Xs, checkmarks, or filled squares creates a chain you become reluctant to break.

Why it works: Self-monitoring interventions are associated with measurable behavior change [4]. The visual feedback loop makes progress (and gaps) impossible to ignore. The simplicity removes decision fatigue: you only need to answer one question per day.

How to set it up:

1. Choose your habit and define what counts as “done” (e.g., 20 minutes of reading, not “read more”)
2. Create your log: a wall calendar with large squares, a grid in a notebook, or a single-purpose habit tracker app
3. Place the log where you will see it daily (bathroom mirror, desk, phone home screen)
4. Each day, mark completion immediately after finishing the habit
5. Review the visual pattern weekly to notice trends

Best for: People who prefer working alone, visual thinkers, anyone building a daily habit, those who want a low-tech foundation.

Common pitfalls: Logging without reviewing; hiding the log where you forget about it; defining “done” too vaguely.

System 2: Public Declaration Boards

How it works: You post your specific commitment and regular progress updates to a stable audience: a whiteboard in your kitchen visible to family, a pinned message in a group chat, or a recurring post in an online community. The audience does not need to actively check on you. The visibility itself creates social stakes.

Why it works: Making intentions public can activate consistency pressure and mild reputational stakes. Functional social support from others is associated with better adherence [5]. The key is a real audience who will see your updates (not posting into the void).

How to set it up:

1. Choose an audience that matters to you: family, close friends, a small online group, or colleagues
2. Write a specific commitment with a measurable target and timeframe
3. Post your commitment where the audience will see it
4. Schedule recurring updates (e.g., every Sunday evening) sharing your progress
5. Keep updates honest and report misses as well as wins

Best for: People motivated by social expectations, extroverts, those with a supportive household or friend group.

Common pitfalls: Choosing an audience that does not actually pay attention; vague commitments that are hard to verify; feeling shame rather than motivation after misses.

System 3: Accountability Rings with Daily Check-Ins

How it works: You form a micro-group of two to four people with similar goals. Every day at a fixed time, each person sends a brief check-in (text, voice note, or app message) reporting whether they completed their habit. The group uses a simple script: “Did it” or “Missed it, here’s why.” No lectures, no advice unless requested.

Why it works: Daily rhythm creates consistent cues. Small group size helps ensure everyone is seen and heard. Research shows social support from peers predicts adherence to exercise and health behaviors [6]. The non-judgmental script keeps the group supportive rather than punitive.

How to set it up:

1. Invite one to three people whose judgment you trust and who share a compatible goal or schedule
2. Agree on a check-in time (e.g., 9 p.m. daily) and channel (group text, Slack, WhatsApp)
3. Establish the script: each person reports completion status and one sentence of context
4. Commit to a 30-day trial before evaluating whether to continue
5. Rotate who sends the first message if energy is flagging

Best for: People who thrive on connection, those building daily habits, remote workers seeking structure, anyone who wants support without public exposure.

Common pitfalls: Group members dropping off; check-ins becoming generic or skipped; offering unsolicited advice instead of support.

System 4: Self-Imposed Financial Stakes

How it works: You deposit money into an account or platform that releases funds only if you meet your goal or forfeits them to a cause you dislike (an “anti-charity”) if you fail. The stakes make skipping feel costly in a tangible way.

Why it works: Loss aversion suggests that losing $50 tends to feel worse than gaining $50 [7]. Commitment devices that tie financial stakes to behavior are recognized tools in behavioral economics. A randomized trial found that financial incentive programs using lotteries and deposit contracts led participants to lose significantly more weight than controls over 16 weeks [8]. The financial consequence adds a layer of accountability that willpower alone cannot replicate.

How to set it up:

1. Define a specific, verifiable goal with a clear deadline
2. Choose a stake amount that feels meaningful but not financially reckless (often $20 to $100 per goal period)
3. Decide the consequence: money goes to a friend, charity, or anti-charity if you fail
4. Use a platform (like StickK or Beeminder) or a trusted friend who holds the funds
5. Establish verification: photo evidence, app data, or a referee who confirms completion

Best for: People motivated by loss aversion, those with clear and verifiable goals, anyone who has tried softer systems without success.

Common pitfalls: Setting stakes too high and creating anxiety; using financial stakes when you are in financial distress; gaming the verification system; short-term gains without internalized motivation.

Important caution: Financial stakes are not appropriate for everyone. Avoid this system if you are experiencing financial hardship or if the stress of potential loss outweighs the motivational benefit. Never use punitive amounts that could harm your wellbeing.

System 5: Group Challenges and Shared Progress Walls

How it works: A group (friends, family, or online community) joins a time-bound challenge with a shared goal. Progress is tracked on a visible “wall” (a spreadsheet, shared app leaderboard, or physical chart) where everyone can see how others are doing.

Why it works: Social comparison and group momentum can increase engagement. Online social networking interventions with progress tracking have shown short-term increases in physical activity [10]. Seeing others succeed creates positive pressure; celebrating together builds community.

How to set it up:

1. Recruit three to ten participants with compatible goals (e.g., “30 workouts in 30 days”)
2. Create a shared tracking document or app visible to all members
3. Set clear rules: what counts as a completed unit, how to log, how often to update
4. Agree on a start and end date (two to four weeks works well for first challenges)
5. Schedule a group check-in or celebration at the end

Best for: Competitive personalities, people energized by community, those with existing friend groups or teams interested in a shared goal.

Common pitfalls: Shaming slower participants; comparisons becoming demotivating; challenges that are too long and lose momentum; unclear or inconsistent tracking.

System 6: The Weekly Review Ritual

How it works: You block 20 to 30 minutes on the same day and time each week to review your habit data, reflect on what helped or hindered you, and plan adjustments for the coming week. The ritual turns reflection into a recurring appointment rather than an afterthought.

Why it works: Implementation intentions (specific plans for when and where to act) are associated with improved goal attainment [3]. Self-monitoring combined with reflection supports adaptive planning. The weekly cadence is frequent enough to catch problems early but not so frequent that it feels burdensome.

Step-by-step: How to Run a Weekly Habit Review Ritual

1. Block 20 to 30 minutes on the same day and time each week (Sunday evening or Monday morning work well)
2. Gather your trackers: logbook, app data, calendar, or notes
3. Count how many days you completed your target habit
4. Write two to three bullets on what helped your best days (time of day, environment, energy level, triggers)
5. Write two to three bullets on obstacles or patterns behind missed days
6. Capture one specific tweak for next week (adjust time, trigger, environment, or support)
7. Define a clear goal for next week (“Complete [habit] on [X] days”)
8. Optional: send a short summary to an accountability partner or private log

Best for: Analytical thinkers, self-directed learners, anyone using logbooks or apps who wants to turn data into insight, people who prefer private accountability.

Common pitfalls: Skipping the review when busy; making it too long and complex; reflecting without making concrete changes.

System 7: Digital Streak Tracking with Social Sharing

How it works: You use an app or platform that tracks consecutive days of habit completion (a “streak”) and optionally shares your progress with friends or a community. The streak count becomes a source of motivation, and social features add light accountability.

Why it works: Self-monitoring via apps is associated with behavior change [4]. The streak mechanic may tap into loss aversion (you do not want to break a 30-day streak) [7]. Social features, when used intentionally, connect you with others pursuing similar goals.

How to set it up:

1. Choose a habit tracker app with streak features (many free options exist)
2. Define exactly what counts as completing the habit each day
3. Enable reminders at a consistent time
4. Decide whether to use social features: add friends, join groups, or keep it private
5. Set a rule for what happens if you miss a day (e.g., restart the streak vs. allow one “skip” per month)

Best for: Tech-comfortable users, people motivated by gamification, anyone who wants light social accountability without deep commitment, those building daily habits.

Common pitfalls: Over-focusing on the streak rather than the underlying habit; feeling devastated after breaking a streak; letting the app become another distraction; novelty wearing off after a few weeks.

System 8: Micro-Commitment Contracts

How it works: You create a very short-term contract (one to seven days) committing to a minimal version of your habit. The contract specifies exactly what you will do, when, and what happens if you miss. After the contract period, you renew, adjust, or upgrade.

Why it works: Implementation intentions are associated with improved follow-through [3]. Short contracts reduce the psychological barrier to starting. The minimal commitment (“I will walk for five minutes after breakfast for the next three days”) is designed to be too easy to fail, building momentum and self-efficacy.

Micro-Commitment Contract Template (1 to 7 Days)

Habit focus:	________________________
Contract duration (dates):	From ____ / ____ / ____ to ____ / ____ / ____
Daily minimum action (exact behavior):	“I will ____________________________”
Completion rule (what counts as done?):	____________________________
Time window (if relevant):	Between ______ and ______ each day
Accountability method (self / partner / app):	____________________________
Consequence for breaking the contract (optional):	____________________________
If I miss a day, my “if-then” plan is:	“If I miss, then I will __________________ tomorrow.”
Signature and date:	____________________________

Best for: People struggling to start, perfectionists who set goals too high, anyone recovering from a habit slump, those who want private accountability.

Common pitfalls: Making the contract too ambitious for the timeframe; not renewing after the contract ends; skipping the “if-then” recovery plan.

System 9: The Accountability Audit System

How it works: Once a month, you conduct a structured review of your accountability systems themselves, not just your habits. You ask: Is this system still serving me? Should I keep, modify, or retire it? The audit prevents systems from becoming stale or burdensome.

Why it works: Habits and life circumstances change. A system that worked in January may feel irrelevant by April. Regular audits support adaptive planning and prevent over-reliance on any single approach. Goal setting research emphasizes the value of feedback and adjustment [9].

How to set it up:

1. Schedule a 20-minute “accountability audit” on your calendar once a month
2. List all the accountability systems you are currently using
3. For each system, answer: Is this system helping me stay on track? Has it become a source of stress or busywork? Does it still fit my schedule and goals?
4. Decide: keep as is, modify (adjust frequency, format, or stakes), or retire
5. If retiring a system, identify what will replace it (if anything)
6. Document your decisions and revisit next month

Best for: People using multiple systems, long-term habit builders, anyone who has experienced accountability fatigue, analytical personalities.

Common pitfalls: Skipping the audit when life gets busy; over-engineering and adding too many new systems; retiring systems prematurely before giving them a fair trial.

Quick Setup Checklist: Launching Any Accountability System in 15 Minutes

Low-Friction Habit Types for Each System

• Automated Logbook: Daily movement, hydration, morning routines , medication
• Public Declaration Boards: Fitness milestones, learning goals, creative projects
• Accountability Rings: Writing practice, exercise, sobriety, meditation
• Financial Stakes: Weight loss, quitting smoking, completing a course or certification
• Group Challenges: Step counts, workout frequency, reading challenges
• Weekly Review Ritual: Complex or variable habits, productivity routines , skill-building
• Digital Streak Tracking: Language learning, daily journaling, exercise streaks
• Micro-Commitment Contracts: Starting any new habit, recovering from a slump, building confidence
• Accountability Audit: Anyone using multiple systems or pursuing long-term goals

How to Choose the Right Accountability System for You

With nine systems to consider, the risk is analysis paralysis or picking something that sounds impressive but does not fit your life. The goal is to match the system to your personality, habit type, schedule, and comfort level with social exposure.

Accountability System Selector: Compare 9 Uncommon Options

System	Core Mechanism	Best For	Time/Effort	Social Exposure	Cost	Key Risk
Automated Logbook	Self-monitoring, visual feedback	Independent, visual thinkers, daily habits	Low (1-2 min/day)	Low	Free	Logging without reviewing
Public Declaration Boards	Social support, consistency pressure	Extroverts, those with supportive circles	Low to Medium	High	Free	Shame after misses
Accountability Rings	Daily social support, peer feedback	Connection-seekers, remote workers	Medium (5-10 min/day)	Medium	Free	Group drop-off
Financial Stakes	Loss aversion, commitment devices	Loss-averse, verifiable goals	Low (setup + verification)	Low to Medium	Variable (stake amount)	Anxiety, gaming the system
Group Challenges	Social comparison, group momentum	Competitive, community-oriented	Medium	High	Free	Shaming slower members
Weekly Review Ritual	Reflection, implementation intentions	Analytical, self-directed learners	Medium (20-30 min/week)	Low	Free	Skipping when busy
Digital Streak Tracking	Self-monitoring, gamification	Tech-comfortable, gamification fans	Low	Low to Medium	Free to Low	Over-focus on streak vs. habit
Micro-Commitment Contracts	Implementation intentions, low barrier	Strugglers to start, perfectionists	Low	Low	Free	Not renewing contracts
Accountability Audit	Meta-reflection, adaptive planning	Long-term builders, multi-system users	Low (20 min/month)	Low	Free	Skipping the audit

Example Walkthrough: Choosing and Using Systems

Scenario: Alex is a 34-year-old remote software engineer who wants to build a consistent morning workout habit. Alex dislikes public posting, has an irregular schedule due to international meetings, and prefers working independently. Alex has tried accountability partners before, but the arrangements always fizzled.

Step 1: Assess the situation. Alex values privacy (low social exposure), has schedule variability (needs flexibility), and has struggled with follow-through (needs a low-barrier start).

Step 2: Consult the comparison table. Systems with low social exposure and low time requirements stand out: Automated Logbook, Micro-Commitment Contracts, Digital Streak Tracking, and Weekly Review Ritual.

Step 3: Start with a micro-commitment contract. Alex fills out the template: “I will do a 10-minute bodyweight workout between 7:00 and 8:30 a.m. for the next 5 days. If I miss, I will do a 5-minute stretch the next morning and reset.” Alex signs and dates the contract.

Step 4: Add an automated logbook. Alex creates a simple grid on a whiteboard near the coffee maker. Each morning after the workout, Alex marks the day with a checkmark. The visual chain becomes a cue and reward.

Step 5: Schedule a weekly review. Every Sunday at 7 p.m., Alex reviews the logbook, notes what helped (quieter mornings, pre-set workout clothes) and what hindered (late-night calls), and adjusts the next week’s contract.

Step 6: Add a monthly accountability audit. At the end of the first month, Alex reviews all three systems. The logbook is working well (keep). The micro-commitment contract feels unnecessary now that the habit has momentum (retire, but keep the template for future slumps). The weekly review is valuable (keep, but shorten to 15 minutes). Alex considers adding a low-stakes digital streak app for extra motivation and decides to trial it for 30 days.

Result: After eight weeks, Alex has completed workouts on 80% of days. The systems evolved as the habit became more automatic. No public posting, no partner drama, just a well-matched, adaptable stack.

Avoiding Common Accountability Traps

Even well-designed accountability systems can backfire. The goal is to catch problems early and adjust before the system becomes a source of stress rather than support.

Red Flags Your Accountability System Is Backfiring

• You feel more shame than motivation after missed days
• You are gaming the system (e.g., logging low-quality reps just to preserve a streak)
• You avoid check-ins or find yourself lying about progress
• Your accountability system takes more time than the habit itself
• You are experiencing financial stress or relationship tension because of the stakes
• You dread your accountability routine instead of feeling supported by it
• You are no longer adjusting the system even though your life has changed significantly

How to Fix Common Problems

Shame spirals: If missed days trigger shame rather than problem-solving, your system may be too public, too punitive, or too all-or-nothing. Switch to a lower-visibility system (logbook, weekly review) and add an “if-then” recovery plan to normalize setbacks.

Gaming the system: If you are checking boxes without real effort, redefine what counts as “done” or raise the bar slightly. Add a qualitative reflection to your weekly review: “Did I show up fully, or just technically?”

Avoidance and dishonesty: If you are hiding from check-ins, the stakes may be too high or the audience may be wrong. Consider shifting to self-monitoring only, or finding a more supportive accountability ring.

Over-engineering: If your systems take more time than your habits, simplify. Drop one or two systems and focus on the one that provides the most value per minute invested.

Financial or social stress: If financial stakes or group pressure are causing anxiety, scale back immediately. Accountability should support your wellbeing, not undermine it.

Stagnation: If a system that once worked now feels irrelevant, run a monthly audit and make a clear decision: keep, modify, or retire.

Frequently Asked Questions

Conclusion

Accountability systems are not about finding the perfect partner or downloading the right app. Effective accountability systems keep your behavior visible, your feedback timely, and your stakes meaningful without requiring constant motivation or willpower.

The nine systems in this guide are not mutually exclusive. You can start with a simple logbook, add a micro-commitment contract to get moving, and layer in a weekly review as your habit stabilizes. Over time, your monthly audits will help you retire what no longer serves you and experiment with new approaches.

The best accountability system is the one you will actually use. Start small. Adjust often. Treat your systems as drafts, not permanent commitments. The goal is not a flawless record but a sustainable practice that keeps your habits on track through the inevitable ups and downs of life.

Next 10 Minutes

• Choose one habit you want to focus on for the next 30 days
• Use the comparison table to pick one accountability system that feels “90% doable”
• Fill out the Micro-Commitment Contract Template or create an Automated Logbook
• Schedule your first Weekly Review Ritual on your calendar

This Week

• Run your chosen system for seven days with “good enough” execution
• Invite one person (or form a micro-group) if your system uses social support
• Notice what feels easier versus harder; jot three observations in your weekly review
• Book a 20-minute block at the end of the week to ask: “Is this system working well enough to keep, or what is my one tweak?”

For more on building habits that stick, see our guide on habit formation techniques .

References

[1] Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010;40(6):998-1009. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.674.

[2] Lally P, Gardner B. Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review. 2013;7(Suppl 1):S137-S158. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2011.603640.

[3] Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006;38:69-119. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1.

[4] Stephenson A, McDonough SM, Murphy MH, et al. Effectiveness of interventions using self-monitoring to reduce sedentary behavior in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2019;16(63):1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0824-3.

[5] DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychology. 2004;23(2):207-218. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207.

[6] Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, et al. Sources of social support as predictors of exercise adherence in women and men ages 50 to 65 years. Health Psychology. 1987;6(4):306. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.6.4.306.

[7] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(2):263-292. DOI: 10.2307/1914185.

[8] Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, et al. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;300(22):2631-2637. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.804.

[9] Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist. 2002;57(9):705-717. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705.

[10] Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, et al. A web-based, social networking physical activity intervention for insufficiently active adults delivered via Facebook app: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(7):e174. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4086.